Improving public defense systems: Good Practices for Federal Panel Attorney Programs

Show simple item record

dc.coverage.spatial Estados Unidos
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:26:45Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:26:45Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/2151
dc.description.abstract How can courts better meet the requirements of Gideon v. Wainright, the Supreme Court decision that guaranteed criminal defendants a right to representation regardless of their ability to pay? As part of its strategic planning process, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts asked Vera to identify and discuss good practices for selecting, managing, appointing, and compensating private counsel, or panel attorneys, in federal courts. This report draws upon a review of the written panel attorney plans of all 94 federal judicial districts, interviews with panel attorney representatives, federal public and community defenders, judges, and court administrators, as well as close analysis of three districts that had made significant efforts to improve their panel systems—Maryland, the Western District of Oklahoma, and Oregon— to identify practices that advance the quality of defense representation, as well as those which improve monetary and other efficiencies.
dc.title Improving public defense systems: Good Practices for Federal Panel Attorney Programs
dc.ceja.source Fuente: <a href="http://www.vera.org" target="_blank">Vera Institute of Justice</a>


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: improving-public-defense.pdf
Size: 423.0Kb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record