Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cary Coglianese
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:23:28Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:23:28Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/997
dc.description.abstract This article presents an empirical assessment of the impact of negotiated rulemaking on two of its principal goals: reducing overall rulemaking time and decreasing the number of judicial challenges to agency rules. Unlike other research, this analysis considers the use of regulatory negotiation by all federal agencies over the past thirteen years. Like others, it gives special attention to rulemaking at the EPA because it has pursued by far the most negotiated rulemakings and it has been the focus of many of the claims about the purported success of the negotiated process.
dc.language.iso English
dc.title Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking
dc.ceja.source Fuente: Duke Law Journal


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: Assessing-Conse ... -Negotiated-Rulemaking.pdf
Size: 2.001Mb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record