Bienvenido a BIBLIOCEJA
Entradas recentes
Item type:Item, Nudos críticos en la implementación de la Ley N.º 21.675(Centro de Estudios de Justicia de las Américas (CEJA), 2026-07) Sánchez Pérez, Rocío; Nakada Castro, Rodrigo; Vera Sánchez, Juan Sebastián; Medina González, Paula; González Correa, Ágata Mía; Seguel Larenas, Constanza; Gutiérrez Parra, KevinEste informe presenta la evaluación realizada por el Centro de Estudios de Justicia de las Américas (CEJA), por encargo del Poder Judicial de Chile y de la Secretaría Técnica de Igualdad de Género y No Discriminación, sobre la implementación de la Ley N.º 21.675, que establece un marco integral para prevenir, sancionar y erradicar la violencia contra las mujeres en razón de su género. El estudio combina un análisis jurídico-dogmático de la normativa con una investigación cualitativa basada en entrevistas a jueces, funcionarios judiciales, Ministerio Público, Defensoría Penal Pública y otros actores del sistema de justicia. A partir de esta metodología, identifica los principales desafíos interpretativos, procedimentales e institucionales que han surgido durante el primer año de vigencia de la ley, poniendo especial énfasis en la incorporación de la perspectiva de género, la delimitación de competencias, la coordinación entre jurisdicciones y la protección efectiva de las víctimas.Item type:Item, Indicators for Evaluating the Independence of Judges and Prosecutors in the Americas(Centro de Estudios de Justicia de las Américas (CEJA), 2025-08) Ponce Chauca, Nataly; Farfán Mallma, JuanIndicators for Evaluating the Independence of Judges and Prosecutors in the Americas presents a methodological framework for assessing judicial and prosecutorial independence through a comprehensive system of qualitative and quantitative indicators. Developed by the Justice Studies Center of the Americas (JSCA), the publication translates international standards on judicial independence into measurable indicators that enable governments, judicial councils, prosecution services, oversight bodies, researchers, and international organizations to evaluate institutional performance using objective and verifiable evidence. The framework distinguishes between de jure, de facto, personal, and institutional dimensions of independence, providing technical definitions, units of measurement, and suggested verification sources for each indicator.Item type:Item, I Índice de Congestión Judicial en las Américas. Estudio Comparado de Poderes Judiciales 2025(Centro de Estudios de Justicia de las Américas (CEJA), 2025-07)El I Índice de Congestión Judicial en las Américas presenta un análisis comparado del desempeño de trece Poderes Judiciales de América Latina mediante el estudio de dos indicadores fundamentales: la Tasa de Resolución Judicial (TR) y la Tasa de Congestión Judicial (TC). A partir de un enfoque cuantitativo, longitudinal y comparado, la publicación examina la evolución de ambos indicadores durante el período 2018–2024, identifica tendencias regionales y nacionales, construye índices comparativos y propone estándares técnicos para evaluar la eficiencia y capacidad resolutiva de los sistemas judiciales. El estudio pone de relieve la estrecha relación entre la resolución de casos y la acumulación de causas pendientes, aportando evidencia para comprender uno de los principales desafíos estructurales de la administración de justicia en la región.Item type:Item, Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: Reflections and Guidelines for the Americas(Centro de Estudios de Justicia de las Américas (CEJA), 2026-05) Pizarro Zúñiga, PabloArtificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: Reflections and Guidelines for the Americas examines the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems across the Americas and proposes a strategic framework for its responsible adoption. The report explores AI applications in judicial administration, case management, legal research, adjudicative support, access to justice, and data protection, while emphasizing the distinction between administrative uses and those directly affecting judicial decision-making. Drawing upon comparative experiences, international standards, and emerging regulatory frameworks, the publication identifies the principal opportunities and challenges associated with AI, highlighting the need to balance innovation, operational efficiency, judicial independence, due process, transparency, and the protection of fundamental rights.Item type:Item, Artificial Intelligence in Public Prosecution: Reflections and Guidelines for the Americas(Centro de Estudios de Justicia de las Américas (CEJA), 2026-05) Pizarro Zúñiga, PabloArtificial Intelligence in Public Prosecution: Reflections and Guidelines for the Americas examines the opportunities, risks, and institutional implications of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into public prosecution services across the Americas. The publication analyzes AI applications throughout the prosecutorial process, including institutional management, case administration, victim services, criminal investigations, legal research, litigation support, predictive analytics, and compliance monitoring. Drawing on comparative experiences, international regulatory frameworks, and emerging best practices, the study identifies the conditions under which AI can improve efficiency, enhance investigative capabilities, strengthen institutional governance, and expand access to justice while safeguarding due process, prosecutorial independence, and fundamental rights. Building on this analysis, the report proposes a governance framework for the responsible adoption of AI in prosecution offices. It emphasizes risk-based implementation, meaningful human oversight, algorithmic transparency, accountability, impact assessments, data protection, and institutional capacity building as essential components of trustworthy AI governance. The publication also addresses the growing challenges posed by AI-enabled criminal activity, highlighting the need for prosecution services to develop technological capabilities capable of responding to increasingly sophisticated forms of crime. Ultimately, the report provides strategic guidance for policymakers, prosecutors, and justice institutions seeking to integrate AI into prosecutorial functions while preserving democratic values, the rule of law, and public confidence in criminal justice systems.