A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author David Luban
dc.coverage.spatial Estados Unidos
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:20:39Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:20:39Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/420
dc.description.abstract The answer I offer in this Article is that crimes against humanity assault one particular aspect of human being, namely our character as political animals. We are creatures whose nature compels us to live socially, but who cannot do so without artificial political organization that inevitably poses threats to our well-being, and, at the limit, to our very survival. Crimes against humanity represent the worst of those threats; they are the limiting case of politics gone cancerous. Precisely because we cannot live without politics, we exist under the permanent threat that politics will turn cancerous and the indispensable institutions of organized political life will destroy us. That is why all humankind shares an interest in repressing these crimes. The theory that I aim to defend here consists of two propositions: (i) that humanity in the label crimes against humanity refers to our nature as political animals, and (ii) that these crimes pose a universal threat that all humankind shares an interest in repressing.
dc.description.abstract Reseña: The answer I offer in this Article is that crimes against humanity assault one particular aspect of human being, namely our character as political animals. We are creatures whose nature compels us to live socially, but who cannot do so without artificial political organization that inevitably poses threats to our well-being, and, at the limit, to our very survival. Crimes against humanity represent the worst of those threats; they are the limiting case of politics gone cancerous. Precisely because we cannot live without politics, we exist under the permanent threat that politics will turn cancerous and the indispensable institutions of organized political life will destroy us. That is why all humankind shares an interest in repressing these crimes. The theory that I aim to defend here consists of two propositions: (i) that "humanity" in the label "crimes against humanity" refers to our nature as political animals, and (ii) that these crimes pose a universal threat that all humankind shares an interest in repressing.
dc.language.iso Inglés
dc.title A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity
dc.ceja.source Fuente: <a href="http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&amp;context=facpub" target="_blank">http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&amp;context=facpub</a>


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: ATheoryofCrimesAgainstHumanity.pdf
Size: 4.435Mb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record