Aboriginal Over-representation and R. v. Gladue: Where We Were, Where We Are and Where We Might Be G

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jonathan Rudin
dc.coverage.spatial Canadá
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:20:39Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:20:39Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/421
dc.description.abstract Clearly the most significant development in the criminal law for Aboriginal people over the last 25 years was the decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Gladue.1 As significant and important as the Gladue decision was, eight years later, rates of Aboriginal over-representation in the Canadian prison system continue to rise.This paper will sketch out the background and history behind the Gladue decision, the impact or lack of impact of the decision on Aboriginal rates of over-representation and the role that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,2 notably section 15, has played and might play in this issue over the coming years.
dc.language.iso English
dc.title Aboriginal Over-representation and R. v. Gladue: Where We Were, Where We Are and Where We Might Be G
dc.ceja.source Fuente:pi.library.yorku.ca


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: 31687.pdf
Size: 268.2Kb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record