Measuring the impact of judicial training

Abstract

Measuring the impact of a judicial training program involves making an assessment of how the training improved the participants’ knowledge, skills, attitudes and overall professional competence to administer justice. Given the complex and inherently subjective nature of judicial work, no single performance indicator can accurately measure these changes. Instead, evaluators must carefully select a range of indicators to measure both the outputs and outcomes of the training, relying on both objective and subjective indicators.