After White: Defending and Amending Canons of Judicial Ethics

Show simple item record

dc.coverage.spatial Estados Unidos
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:24:36Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:24:36Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/1346
dc.description.abstract In the White case, the Supreme Court decided by a 5-4 vote that, under the First Amendment, states cannot prohibit a candidate for judicial office from “announc[ing] his or her views on disputed legal or political issues.”
dc.title After White: Defending and Amending Canons of Judicial Ethics
dc.ceja.source Fuente: <a href="http://www.brennancenter.org" target="_blank">Brennan Center, NYU Law School</a>


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: brennancenter-org.pdf
Size: 1.520Mb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record