In Defense of Judicial Elections

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jonathan M. Hooks
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:26:45Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:26:45Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/2161
dc.description.abstract his past fall, Alabamians re-elected three incumbent state supremecourt justices, elected one newassociate justice and ushered in a newera electing this state’s first female chiefjustice.With these elections behind us,and in the wake of spent campaign coffers,deteriorating roadside campaignsigns and tired volunteers, an old issuehas surfaced once again within theAlabama State Bar: Should this state continueelecting judges, or should we, as astate, choose a new method to put appellatejudges onto our highest courts?This past fall, Alabamians re-electedthree incumbent state supremecourt justices, elected one newassociate justice and ushered in a newera electing this state’s first female chiefjustice. With these elections behind us,and in the wake of spent campaign coffers,deteriorating roadside campaignsigns and tired volunteers, an old issuehas surfaced once again within theAlabama State Bar: Should this state continueelecting judges, or should we, as astate, choose a new method to put appellatejudges onto our highest courts? 
dc.language.iso English  
dc.title In Defense of Judicial Elections
dc.ceja.source Fuente: The Alabama Lawyer


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: In-Defense-of-Judicial-Elections.pdf
Size: 7.771Mb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record