Judicial Independence and the Democratic Order

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jeffrey K. Staton, Christopher Reenock, Marius Radean
dc.coverage.spatial USA
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:26:50Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:26:50Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/2259
dc.description.abstract Reseña:Do legal institutions that limit governmental power promote order in democracies? Although the worldwide rule of law project predicates its reform efforts on knowing the answer to this question, we are aware of no systematic empirical test. Further mainstream literatures on democratic survival and civil conflict simply ignore the role of law in promoting order. In this paper we suggest how models of law can be linked to political economies of order. On this account, independent courts help police fundamental democratic compromises by addressing problems of monitoring and coordination. Empirically, we find that independent courts encourage order, but especially so when macroeconomic conditions favor inter-class compromise and when natural resources incentivize predation. The key implication is that though judicial reform may ultimately help stabilize regimes in some contexts, in others, its effect on order will be small and indirect at best.
dc.language.iso English
dc.title Judicial Independence and the Democratic Order
dc.ceja.source Fuente: University of Texas School of Law


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: Judicial-Independence-and-the-Democratic-Order.pdf
Size: 411.3Kb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record