The Independence of Judges

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Adam Winkler and the Honorable James Zagel
dc.coverage.spatial USA
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:29:13Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:29:13Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/3556
dc.description.abstract Reseña:We want to consider what judicial independence means from an introspective ange - from the inside-out as it were, seen through the judges' eyes. An introspective approach seeks to understand judicial independence not by reference to the structural organization of the three branches of government, but by reference to the judge's own perception of her ability to adjudicate cases. Our model is a self-reflective judge... Judges occupy a place of high tension, located at the intersection of numerous different restraints and liberties. An introspective understanding indicates that structural arguments are incompatible because they focus solely on the threat posed to the judiciary by the other two branches of government, ignoring what is made clear by introspection, the threat to independent adjudication posed by and within the judiciary itself. An introspective approach also shows that many forms of constraint felt by judges that interfere with independent adjudication exist beyond the realm of law and legal doctrine, partaking of the realm of culture. Finally, it shows that the structure of the Constitution... is simply one part of the foundation of independence...
dc.language.iso English
dc.title The Independence of Judges
dc.ceja.source Fuente: UCLA School of Law


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: The-Independence-of-Judges.pdf
Size: 656.4Kb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record