Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jack Snyder and Leslie Vinjamuri
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-07T15:29:38Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-07T15:29:38Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/3658
dc.description.abstract This paper argues that pursuit of justice via prosecution of the perpetrators after incidences of human rights violation is often ineffective and argues instead for solutions such as amnesty or truth commissions. Snyder and Vinajmuri argue that a norm-governed political order must be based on a political bargain among contending groups and on the creation of robust administrative institutions that can predictably enforce the law. They assert that preventing atrocities and enhancing respect for the law will frequently depend on striking politically expedient bargains that create effective political coalitions to contain the power of potential perpetrators of abuses. This paper addresses the different aspects of promoting these strategies of international justice.
dc.language.iso English
dc.title Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice
dc.ceja.source Fuente: International Security


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: Trials-and-Errors.pdf
Size: 157.8Kb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record