Bankruptcy and State Collections: The Case of the Missing Garnishments

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Richard M. Hynes
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-08T19:11:58Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-08T19:11:58Z
dc.identifier.uri http://desa1.cejamericas.org:8080/handle/2015/4875
dc.description.abstract Recent bankruptcy reforms were spurred in part by a bankruptcy filing rate that has more than doubled in the last ten years and that has risen by approximately six hundred percent over the last generation. Some attribute this surge in filings to Americans’ greater willingness to avoid debts by declaring bankruptcy. Most academics, however, argue that more Americans are forced into bankruptcy by crushing debt burdens and aggressive collections techniques. Surprisingly, the literature has largely ignored data on the use of these collections techniques. This Article examines the use of one of the most important collections tools, garnishment, in two jurisdictions: the Commonwealth of Virginia and Cook County, Illinois. While the bankruptcy filing rate has risen dramatically in each of these jurisdictions, the rate of garnishment has declined. Because prior studies specifically cite garnishment as one of the leading triggers of bankruptcy, the “missing garnishments” in each of these jurisdictions challenge the claim that an increase in financial distress has caused the rise in bankruptcy filings.
dc.language.iso English
dc.title Bankruptcy and State Collections: The Case of the Missing Garnishments
dc.ceja.source Fuente: College of William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository


Files in this item

Thumbnail Files: Bankruptcy-and- ... e-Missing-Garnishments.pdf
Size: 1.169Mb
Format: PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record